PULLING
YOUR MONEY OUT Of The Banking System Will Deal A DEATH BLOW TO TYRANNY
“The way
to undo the system, then, is to initiate its collapse…as a way to break the
cycle of encroaching tyranny.” After U.S. markets peaked in September nearly two years after
Donald Trump’s victory came with the promise (and delivery) of pro-growth
policies, investors got a scare in December when several factors combined with interest
rate hikes by the Federal
Reserve to drive down indexes.
The Dow Jones, Nasdaq,
and the S&P 500 all finished the year lower than they were in September.
Worse, there are predictions that 2019 could hit markets harder.
Bank of America
just polled 234 panelists who manage more than $645 billion in
investments where they think global growth is heading over the next 12 months,
and 60 percent said it will be negative.
On top of this potential
nightmare scenario is the fact that governments around the world comprising the
largest economies have nearly all become debtor nations that are one economic
calamity away from global collapse.
As noted by Robert Gore
at The Burning Platform blog, France’s Yellow Vest protesters
may have inadvertently hit upon a way to bring about the collapse of the fiat
money and debt system that is sustaining the very governments which
increasingly suppress the people they are supposed to serve.
Gore notes that in recent
days the French protesters — whom, you recall, took to the streets in response
to a massive gasoline tax pushed by President Emmanuel Macron to fund France’s
contributions to combat “global warming” agreed to at the Paris Accords in 2015
— have advocated a run on the
country’s banks. Such a run, if it
occurs, could actually start a chain reaction that would spread to other
ostensibly wealthy countries including the United States.
“Whether they realize it
or not, they’re playing with nuclear warheads that could annihilate not just
the French, but Europe’s and the entire world’s financial system,” Gore writes.
“Because inextricably
linked to the ends of contemporary governments ? how much they can screw up the
lives of those who must live under them—is the question of means ? how do they
fund their misrule? The short answer is taxes and debt,” he added.
Collapsing the corrupt banking
system will deal a death blow to tyranny
Since President Richard
Nixon took the U.S. off the gold standard in 1971, our monetary system has been
based on fiat currency and debt. That matters because the dollar is considered
the world’s reserve currency; nearly all nations trade in it for commodities
and use it to pay bills because it’s believed to be the most stable.
(Related: CONVERGENCE: The
inescapable explanation that connects all world events unfolding now… can you
handle the cosmic truth?)
Fiat currency is not tied
to any tangible asset, like precious metals, so our government —
and other governments — can create as much debt as they desire (debt by
fiat). And they have.
The global economic
system is based on this fiat debt. Currencies have values that are assigned to
them given certain market conditions, economic indicators, and other factors.
When those are perceived to be doing well, currency values go up, and vice
versa when the indicators are ‘down.’
So, how does a run on a
single bank in France “turn into a loose yarn that once pulled, unravels the
whole sweater?” Gore wrote.
“The bank tries to
increase its liquid funds, drawing on whatever lines of emergency credit it may
have, and to convert it’s illiquid assets into liquid assets, calling in loans.
This pressures other banks and financial institutions, who draw on their lines
of credit and call their loans and so on until the system collapses,” he
writes.
And the more indebted
economic systems are, the more vulnerable to collapse in a crisis.
“Bankruptcy is a when,
not an if,” noted Gore. “Debt is the Achilles heel of the world’s governments.
A widespread run on financial institutions will dramatically reduce credit
availability and raise interest rates, and it will shut off credit entirely for
some of them. Under those circumstances, tax revenues will shrink as well.”
The way to undo the
system, then, is to initiate its collapse — as the Yellow Vests are advocating
— as a way to break the cycle of encroaching tyranny.
Nomi
Prins: Volatility Holds The Key To The Markets In 2019
Because
of recent volatility, Nomi expects the Fed to dial back its balance sheet
reduction efforts. What’s that mean for the stock market? Nomi explains…Over the last two weeks, after making good on
the four-rate interest hike of 2018, Fed Chairman, Jerome Powell, became more
dovish to start 2019.
His change in tone is
worth considering because of his historical stance on reducing the amount of
artificial stimulus coming from the Fed. Last week, after the required
five-year holding period for Fed transcripts were up, we got a glimpse into Powell’s thoughts from 2013, before
he was Chairman.
Powell tried to persuade
then-Chairman, Ben Bernanke, to reduce the Fed’s stimulus, even though it would
lead to greater near-term market volatility. That was when the third round of
the Fed’s asset-buying program (QE3) was in full swing. The Fed was purchasing
an estimated $85 billion per month mix of Treasuries and mortgage-backed
securities.
To indicate that the Fed
wouldn’t buy bonds forever, Bernanke floated the idea of slowing down its
program, or “tapering,” at some non-defined future date.
Powell, on the other
hand, believed the market needed a specific “road map” of the Fed’s
intentions. He said that he wasn’t “concerned about a little bit of
volatility” though he was “concerned that there may be more than that here.”
Indeed, once Bernanke
publicly announced the possibility of the Fed’s bond-buying program slowing
down, the market tanked, in a response that became known as a “taper tantrum.” As a result, Bernanke backed off the
tapering idea.
Fear of more taper
tantrums kept the Fed in check after that. The Fed ultimately waited until it
had raised rates sufficiently, before starting to cut the size of its balance
sheet. But now Powell is the Chairman. And it seems that he is much less
comfortable with volatility than he was under Bernanke, as his most recent
remarks indicate.
But it certainly wouldn’t
be the first time a Fed chairman has modified his views when he was in control.
Alan Greenspan, for example, was a staunch advocate of the gold standard when
he was younger (and as presented in Foreign Affairs). But once he was Fed head, suddenly he
thought a gold standard wasn’t such a hot idea after all. Go figure.
In the case of Jerome
Powell, his new sensitivity to volatility means the Fed will be watching the
markets for high volatility that causes sell-offs, even if also espousing their
“data driven” mentality. And that he is prepared to act should that happen by
backing off the Fed’s current forecast for reducing its balance sheet.
I’ve argued before that
the Fed isn’t reducing its balance sheet as aggressively as it would have you
believe. And I certainly expect it to dial back even more so in light of the
recent volatility.
The reason is obvious.
The main catalyst for the
bull market that surfaced over the past 10 years since the financial crisis in
2008 was stimulus that was fueled by the Fed and other leading central banks.
This money acted as an artificial stimulant or “drug” to financial asset
prices.
The world’s leading
central banks have been following the Fed’s lead in withdrawing liquidity. And
even though global liquidity really began drying up late last year to a minimal
degree relative to its size, it should come as no surprise that markets have
threw a tantrum.
Since early October,
we’ve seen a lot of price volatility, with several hundred-point daily swings
in the markets becoming the norm. Powell calmed the waters with his dovish comments on January 4 and the following week as
well. But make no mistake, the waters are still choppy.
Many on Wall Street
expect to see more volatility ahead and are forecasting that 2019 will be rocky
for the stock market. But others on Wall Street are, in direct contrast,
forecasting a continued bull market.
That’s the other driver
of volatility — clashing opinions and wildly divergent market forecasts. We
haven’t had much volatility in recent years because nearly everyone was on the
same side of the bet. That’s all changed now.
To add to the market
turmoil, the federal government shutdown has now officially entered its fourth
week. It is now the longest shutdown on record. But the shutdown also has real
economic ramifications outside of the DC beltway.
First, in a climate where
the expansion of business activity is already slowing down, the shutdown is
causing economists to further lower first-quarter GDP estimates. That puts a
lid on expansion and hiring plans for both psychological and actual risk
reasons.
More than 800,000 federal
workers have missed
paychecks, which means less money to pay bills and purchase goods and services
that contribute to the American economy. But that’s not the only problem,
although it might seem far more important, especially to those missing
paychecks.
From an information
standpoint, the state of the economy is tough to predict without data produced
by agencies like the Department of Commerce. For instance, farmers, already
hurting from trade wars, won’t be able to get key data on figures like monthly
international shipments to plan crop schedules.
Then there’s the Federal Reserve itself. Whether you think it should or
not be setting interest rates at all, the Fed determines interest rates while
considering factors such as market volatility, slowing economic figures and
trade wars. The best way to do that is to access real data. Now, business
conditions will be hard to gauge accurately if reports aren’t available due to
the shutdown.
That means the shutdown
will stoke volatility in the markets until an agreement is reached. And when
that will be is anybody’s guess right now. No real progress has been made and there
doesn’t appear to be an end in sight.
But this week, the
markets will be getting new information to digest. The release of
fourth-quarter earnings reports will begin with big banks. These will provide
more insight into how companies performed during the year-end volatility in
2018.
The corporate earnings
outlook on Wall Street is fairly negative. Companies have been managing expectations downward. Apple, for instance, chopped its forecasted
revenue figures last month, citing the slowdown in China’s economic growth as a reason
for less iPhone sales. Apple stock lost about 10% on the day of the
announcement, taking the overall market down with it.
Analysts are now estimating fourth quarter profit growth of 14.5%
for the S&P 500 companies. That’s down from the 20.1% they forecast at the
start of the quarter. But that could actually be a good thing for share prices.
The lower the bar, the
greater the possibility it can be exceeded. There’s more upside potential in
that case, in other words. That means if earnings begin to outperform prior
forecasts next week, it could very well lift the markets. This tension of
negative and positives factors will foster a see-saw of a quarter in the
markets mixed with volatility, so being aware and nimble will be the best
strategy.
But the volatility could
present a great trading opportunity. Wall Street knows that it doesn’t matter if
information is positive or negative — there are still ways to profit from the
right information.
Something called the Cboe
Volatility Index (VIX) is widely considered a “fear gauge.” That’s because it’s
supposed to reflect what swings in the S&P 500 index could be over the next
month.
The VIX computes its
levels based on outstanding options contracts which are supposed to indicate
the price that investors, or speculators, are willing to pay for protection
against their positions going bad.
Currently, the VIX should
be higher than it is. It recently spiked, but then settled down much lower than
what the real volatility of the S&P has been this past month.
Usually, options tend to
over-price volatility. That’s because people buy options in order to place bets
on the future, or to protect themselves from wild swings in share prices. The
less certain they are, the more they are willing to pay for that protection.
Yet, right now, the cost
of protection is cheap. That’s like your health insurance premium all of a
sudden dropping just when you catch a major illness. It doesn’t quite make
sense.
That means that while
fourth-quarter earnings season reports are emerging, it’s a good time to take
advantage of buying these cheap options. Buying them on certain companies can
protect you against adverse swings in share prices due to earnings announcements.
It’s a form of portfolio insurance. And again, it’s relatively cheap.
That’s one pivotal key to
being a great investor — accessing information. Sure, the more insights and
information you have, the more overwhelming it can seem. However, if you can
stay focused, your portfolio will thank you.
0 comments:
Post a Comment