America's Second Civil War
Has Already Begun
In an excellent article by Jeff Lukens here on American Thinker, he asks the
question, “Is a second civil war coming?” In reply, I say that America’s
second civil war has already begun. Its opening shots were fired by
Barack Obama when he stated, “We are five days away from fundamentally
transforming the United States of America.”
Most of this country is center-right and
never considered America a place that needed transformation. Most people
can think of things they would change but few believe the nation needs to be
torn down and rebuilt. Obama failed but the left soldiers on in its quest
for a new America remade in their own image.
When Obama went on his world apology tour,
he wasn’t apologizing forAmerica, he was apologizing for Americans.
This is the essence of this second civil war. Leftists are demi-gods who
believe they are America and that anyone who does not
believe in them cannot lay legitimate claim to this country as their own.
Yes, this war has begun. The opening
skirmish was the Obama presidency itself, which history will see as a failure,
despite what the media want us to believe in the here and now. Sure, he
passed ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank, overregulated, and ruled by executive diktat
to great media acclaim. Yet, ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank have been whittled
away by legislation and judicial rulings, while Trump has prioritized deregulation
and reversed many of Obama’s illegal executive orders.
The war’s second battle was the 2016
presidential election when Hillary Clinton, Obama’s chosen successor, lost to a
television personality whom very few took seriously as a candidate. Trump
won despite the Obama administration conspiring with the Clinton campaign to
steal the election and has remained as president even as that conspiracy
fundamentally transformed into a failed coup attempt to depose him.
Trump’s presidency has been the third
battle and with his string of successes, the battle is being won. This,
despite near-universal acrimony and condemnation among the media, the
Democrats, and the left.
But, “what difference, at this point, does it make?” because these
victories are pyrrhic. As the eminent Michael Walsh said of the left,
“they never stop, they never sleep, they never quit.” Democrats are
chipping away at this nation with their policies. This is a war of
attrition and we Americans are being attrited.
For example, their “open borders” policy
is effectively importing a new electorate -- one guaranteed to vote for
them. The left agrees with Obama, there is nothing wrong with America,
it’s those damn Americans, so they are going to drown the conservative vote
with new Democrats. It’s the same with their policy of “everything should
be free.” Why vote for someone who promises equal opportunity when
someone else promises a better outcome?
Nuclear winter became global warming
became climate change became “we want total control over everything.” The
reason why Democrat candidates for the presidency so quickly signed on to my
congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal is its promise of
comprehensive control over every aspect of our lives. Eliminating planes,
trains, and automobiles will keep us close to our homes and jobs or for those
“unwilling to work” in their basement enjoying their “universal basic
income.” Dependent people without mobility are easier to control.
The 2020 election looms as the next battle
and it will be hard fought because Democrats have myriad policies that may
sound great but are really about control. They have always been masters
of micturating down our leg and telling us it is raining.
Yet, they don’t need to trick us into
acquiescence, because even should Trump win, without a complete reversal by the
Democratic Party, a renewed free and fair media, and a return to the principles
upon which this nation was founded, this war will continue, and it is only a
matter of time before the left again wins the Presidency, or the House, or the
Senate -- or all three.
When that happens, this civil war will
become hot because the Democrats are going to come for our guns. An armed
citizenry is a free citizenry, and they can’t have that.
The third most populated nation with
330,000,000 people, America has an estimated 350 million guns in circulation;
any effort to seize them will call for the total mobilization of our armed
forces, city and state police, and the National Guard.
People are not going to turn in their guns
and politicians who think they will do so are being naïve. Fighting will
surely ensue as the forces of the regime go door to door to try to take
them.
Many of those empowered to confiscate
weapons won’t obey orders. Defections will be common and there will be
fighting in the streets, limited at first, but it will soon break out into open
rebellion. The regime will become increasingly strident and many states
will refuse to comply. Using Democratic-run “sanctuary cities” as an
example of state nullification of federal law, talk of secession will become
rife.
The ruling leftists will, of course, be
surprised, and orders will be given to the remaining loyalist forces to put
down the rebellion. In the end, the death toll will far exceed the
620,000 people who died in our first civil war.
To people who say it can’t happen here, I
say history is replete with examples of places that no longer exist where
people believed “it can’t happen here.”
It can’t happen here? Open your
eyes, it has already begun.
Has
the Trump presidency exposed the need to implement a mechanism/policy that
would prevent bad-faith Congressional investigations/witch-hunts?
The
Democratic-controlled House is obsessed with bringing down President Trump and
removing him from office. When Republicans controlled the House and Senate,
there was a system of checks and balances in place that “served” to prevent
partisan and “bad-faith” investigations from going forward. This is not to say
that Republicans were there to stymy legitimate investigations. Rather, they
were there to prevent/curtail investigations and conduct that solely reeked of
partisanship and vengeance. Now that Democrats control the House, multiple
investigations are moving forward at a rapid pace. Sadly, there does not appear
to be a strong and reliable mechanism in place to prevent these types of
seemingly partisan and bad-faith investigations from going forward. Perhaps
there should be.
Democrats
have been quite vocal about their goals. An article in the Washington Examiner set forth their plans
once they took control, stating:
The New York Times reports Democrats are
planning for political revenge, with a blitzkrieg of “investigations into
nearly every corner of the Trump administration.” Large numbers of House
Democrats are likely to push for impeachment either of Trump or,
following Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s lead, of newly appointed Supreme
Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.”
It doesn’t matter that, with
the Senate probably firmly in Republican hands, there would be no chance of
securing the two-thirds vote needed there to remove either one from office. The
very effort to impeach would dominate House activity and headlines, further
ratchet up a toxic political atmosphere, detract from any ability to handle
even the most basic legislation, and cause political and cultural instability
that could shake the U.S. economy and undermine the country’s international
standing.
The
fundamental problem with endless Congressional investigations and/or
investigations stemming from partisanship and/or bad-faith is that there is no
apparent system of checks and balances in place to prevent abuse. Moreover,
there does not appear to be a way to prevent these types of
investigations/conduct from taking place and/or moving forward.
For
example, Congressional Democrats have threatened to impeach the president for
years. While the Constitution provides a safety net before a president can
actually be removed, it does not necessarily provide a mechanism within which
to prevent one party from initiating (and pursuing) partisan or bad-faith
impeachment proceedings. Therefore, if Democrats in the House decided to
prepare articles of impeachment (no matter how weak or baseless the grounds),
Republicans would be virtually powerless until later on in the process. Until
then, a long and expensive investigation would take place and the government
would be at a standstill, as virtually nothing would get done. While Democrats
have not pursued impeachment yet,
they are facing mounting pressure from some of their bigger donors, who expect them to do.
Another
similar area of concern involves the House Intelligence Committee, which is now
controlled by the Democrats. According to the San Diego Union-Tribune, the Committee recently
indicated that it intended to expand its work to look into any alleged foreign
influence over the president by Russia or any other country. In doing so,
Democrats could potentially look into the president’s personal finances and the
Trump Organization. According to Jack Langer, a spokesman for Republicans
on the Committee, “[t]his is a gross abuse of a committee that was created to
do oversight of the intelligence community, not to conduct sprawling, endless
investigations of one party’s political opponents.”
Ironically,
not only did the Democratic-controlled Committee decide to expand its
inquiry, it also voted to send copies of various transcripts of its closed-door
interviews to Robert Mueller, who happens to be investigating the president.
Given that Democrats now control the Committee, Republicans on the Committee
are somewhat limited when it comes to stopping the Committee’s seemingly
partisan “investigations” against the president and/or those associated with
him.
It
would not be unreasonable to implement additional and/or new measures to
prevent bad-faith, partisan or meritless Congressional claims/investigations.
Such measures exist in the legal context, where there are laws/rules in place
that penalize litigants and/or their lawyers from pursuing meritless claims or
engaging in “bad-faith” litigation. In the federal context, for example, Rule 11 serves this purpose.
While
Congress’ power is immense, there must be a way to prevent the abuse of such
power when it becomes self-evident. The confirmation process involving Justice
Kavanaugh is but one example of how some in Congress can abuse their power and
pursue partisan and bad-faith investigations without any significant risks.
If
there were stronger policies, laws or mechanisms in place, perhaps those
choosing to pursue such partisan and bad-faith investigations would think
twice. That would be a positive development no matter what side of the
political aisle one sits on.
Which Hillary Clinton Should We Believe? The One Who Tells Us To
Reject Trump’s Attempts To Divide Us With Fear, Or The One Who Tells Us “We Are
Living Through a Full-Fledged Crisis Of Our Democracy?”
Hillary Clinton is hitting the panic button
over Trump, telling an audience “we are living though a full-fledged crisis in
our democracy.”
“We are living through a full-fledged crisis in our democracy,”
Hillary Clinton says at this voting rights/unity breakfast. Says we’re living
in a time when “racist and white supremacist views are lifted up in the media
and the White House.”
Damn! That’s scary! Like…super scary.
Is this really the same Hillary who told the
world over and over again that Trump was trying to divide the nation through
fear?
MEDIA SILENCE CONTINUES: Clinton Foundation Connected AGT
Forwarded Top Secret US Intel to RUSSIA – Made Bribes to Seal Deals – FBI/DOJ
Covered It Up – Part VI
A 2016 DOJ criminal investigation was suppressed and buried by
the DOJ/FBI that involved a major NY Democratic power broker and the Clintons
and the Clinton Foundation.
The investigation revolved around the illegal sale of controlled
US Homeland Security technology to Russia and China in the years before the
2016 election by a company named AGT.
The DOJ terminated its internal investigation in 2016 despite
clear and irrefutable evidence of criminal activity and hid it from the public!
In Part
I of our series we discussed the Clinton Foundation and
the donations to the Foundation from the COB (Martin L. Edelman) and CEO (Mati
Kochavi) of AGT International as well as from Sheikhs in the UAE. These
donations in the millions of dollars were for favors from the Clintons. In
return the Clintons helped promote AGT –
In Part
II of our series we discussed the illegal
actions that AGT International took to generate revenues around the globe.
Highly sensitive US defense technology and ITAR classified products were
provided to China, Russia and other countries in the name of sales growth.
These actions were beyond criminal, they were treasonous.
(Below
is an AGT article about its premier defense software from its company 4D
Security Solutions.)
In Part
III of our series we discussed the
investigation that the FBI/DOJ started into AGT and the Clinton Foundation but
then terminated and covered up before the 2016 Presidential election despite
irrefutable crimes!
In Part
IV of our series we discussed the
activities by individuals associated with AGT in obtaining entrance to a highly
sensitive US Intel facility circumventing the controls in place that prevent
illegal entries to the facility.
In Part
V of our series we discussed the efforts by AGT to
obtain top secret US Intel for the sole purpose of selling to the
Russians. AGT personnel used the information as a means to entice sales
from US adversaries. AGT offered Russians the ability to conduct
counter-Intel operations (e.g. cell phone intercepts, object and vehicle
tracking, etc.). All of this information provided to the Russians was
highly classified and never should have been placed in their hands. This
information was provided by AGT senior managers like Gadi Lenz, a US national
who also held a key executive position at the US based defense
contractor 4D Security Solutions.
Below
image shows the LinkedIn profile of Gadi Lenz that identifies him as a CTO at
4D Security Solutions and a chief scientist at AGT.
Below
is an image showing a Cyber Security solution AGT offered to the Russian
government –
Image
below shows an AGT C4I system deployed in Liaoyuan China. The system among other
things was designed to automatically track and create a detailed pattern of
motion of vehicles belonging to western embassies.
Today we’ll continue with our
series and show the shady efforts AGT took to obtain contracts in the
US. AGT utilized its COB and the Clintons to gain access to highly
placed Law Enforcement Agents (LEA’s) and former Federal and political figures
in order to open doors and gain access to federal, state, and political
leads that helped the company penetrate the US market.
What would another Clinton
scandal be without the likes of former Clinton Secretary of Energy Bill
Richardson? For example, in a meeting designed help an AGT company
(3i-MIND) sell to the US law enforcement market, Thomas Betro, the
head of 3i-MIND’s Global Law Enforcement practice and the former National
Counterintelligence Executive arranged for some
“Consulting” Services with the following participants:
1.
John Magaw–
President Clinton’s Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
(ATF) from 1993 to 1999. Prior to that he was Director of the United
States Secret Service from 1992 to 1993. Magaw took over the ATF after the Waco
siege that ended when the FBI attempted to overrun the Branch Davidian compound
resulting in a fire that killed more than 70 people.
2.
Bradley
Buckles– President Clinton’s former Director of the US Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives beginning in 1999. Buckles
followed Magaw in this role.
3.
Governor Bill Richardson–
President Clinton’s Former U.S. Ambassador to United Nations and former U.S.
Secretary of Energy, Richardson was later elected Governor of New Mexico.
While Secretary of Energy,
Richardson’s Energy Department was marred
by an incident where a Chinese man by the name of Wen Ho Lee was
charged with spying at the Los Alamos National Laboratories. Later a
couple of computer drives were found missing at the same location. After
delays in providing information on the lost drives, in June 2000 the FBI baled
Richardson out –
Two highly sensitive computer hard drives that were missing from
the Los Alamos National Laboratories earlier this year never left the premises,
and the FBI has uncovered no hints of espionage in the case, Energy Secretary
Bill Richardson told a Senate committee Wednesday.
Richardson was later considered
for a position on the Obama Administration but Richardson withdrew
his nomination because of an investigation into whether he exchanged New
Mexico state government contracts for campaign financing. Obama’s
Department of Justice eventually killed the
investigation into these pay-for-play allegations.
It seems expected that Clinton
Foundation donors Edelman and Kochavi would involve the likes of Richardson and
the Clintons in their efforts to promote their company – AGT. On August
3rd and August 9th, 2011, AGT held meetings with the three experts above.
As
a result of these meetings, AGT lined up contracts in the following police
departments around the country –
·
Tucson
·
Newark
·
Boston
·
Colorado Springs
·
San Diego
·
Riverside
·
Memphis
·
Jacksonville
AGT
regularly utilized and paid off highly placed former military, LEA and former
Federal and political figures to open doors to obtain classified
information. For example, below is an image showing a cash envelope used
to pay off officials in one Asia Pacific country –
0 comments:
Post a Comment